To boil or not? Lobster fundraisers raise ethical questions

By Pat McCaughan
Posted Sep 22, 2017

[Episcopal News Service] People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has called for vegan bake sales instead of lobster boil fundraisers, but some Episcopalians are finding the request a bit tough to swallow.

Melissa Mary Wilson, coordinator for the Christian outreach division of PETA, called for an end to the popular fundraisers in a late August letter to Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Michael Curry.

Noting that Sept. 25 is National Lobster Day, Wilson said at least 17 Episcopal churches from Maine to Maryland to Mississippi, “collectively kill more than 10,000 lobsters annually.”

While Francine Sabisch, parish administrator at St. Peter’s by-the-Sea Episcopal Church in Swansboro, North Carolina, generally supports PETA, she disagrees with the effort.

A Maine native, she said lobster boils are “part of life, part of the culture” there and elsewhere, and not just for churches but also for many local municipalities and other groups.

The church’s annual Lobsterfest took place on Sept. 16, raising about $7,300. The proceeds will go to local agencies and most probably for flood relief for those impacted by recent hurricanes.

“In previous years, we’ve helped Backpack Buddies, and two different women’s shelters. Every year, we help out the literacy council,” Sabisch said.

The funds raised have also benefited worker-retraining programs, hospice centers, boys and girls clubs, wounded warrior projects and animal rescue organizations, and have helped purchase new band equipment for local high schools, she added.

St. Peter’s by-the-Sea Church in Swansboro, North Carolina, uses the proceeds of its annual Lobsterfest to benefit local community groups. Photo: St. Peter’s

The lobsters typically weigh about 1.5 pounds; the church sells them for $18 to $21, depending on current market price and whether they are cooked or uncooked, she said. This year the church sold about 700, and has set a goal to sell 1,000 next year.

“Everyone is very conscientious,” Sabisch said. “Everyone who is involved in handling God’s creatures. We will do everything as humanely as possible.”

LAMBS, or “Least Among My Brothers and Sisters,” is PETA’s Christian education division. Its name was “inspired by the verse in Matthew 25:40 in which Jesus tells his followers that whenever you show kindness to those in most need, it’s as if you’re doing that kindness as unto Jesus himself,” said Ben Williamson, PETA’s senior international media director, in an email to Episcopal News Service.

“With so few legal protections, lobsters and other animals are truly ‘the least’ among us — and in dire need of our compassion and mercy,” Williamson said.

PETA believes one popular method of cooking — boiling the lobsters — is cruel. “Most of us grew up believing that killing lobsters and other animals for food is what must be done, but if we contemplate it, all killing requires conquering, violence and separating ourselves from the rest of creation,” PETA wrote to the presiding bishop. “God designed humans to be caretakers, not killers.”

Curry was unavailable for comment, but Episcopal Church spokeswoman Neva Rae Fox said: “PETA has presented an interesting point but local congregations are the decision-makers for their events.”

Williamson said LAMBS researchers compiled a list from an Internet search of church lobster events, many of which state the number of lobsters involved at each event. “The list accounts for at least 10,800 lobsters at 17 churches,” he said. “There are likely at least another 1,000 from five churches who gave vague responses.”

He added: “We would encourage anyone and everyone to reflect on their own attitudes about causing unnecessary suffering, and move towards a plant-based diet for their health, for the sake of the environment, and because it’s the right thing to do.”

PETA specifically cited St. Timothy’s Episcopal Church in Greenville, North Carolina. According to the church website, the church has sold more than 65,000 lobsters since the fundraisers began in 1978. Yearly, the effort has raised as much as $20,000 to benefit the local community.

PETA’s invitation raises important ethical questions, not only for Episcopalians, but all Christians, to wrestle with the way faith informs their daily lives and decisions, according to the Rev. John Porter-Acee, a priest in the Diocese of East Carolina.

“It is our call as Christians to try to reduce suffering in the world,” said Porter-Acee, a former environmental educator. “Every choice we make is a choice to pursue our faith in one way or another, and to think about investments and fundraisers and food choices as opportunities to decrease the amount of suffering in the world and to support entities that have that goal as well.”

But the issue is a complicated one. “If you’re going to do a fundraiser and encourage people to contribute and support it as a suffering-free fundraiser, perhaps one year instead of everybody buying lobster, they buy sweet potatoes,” Porter-Acee said. “But I don’t think we’ll raise $20,000 to benefit the community.”

Additionally, sweet potatoes — and other vegetables for that matter — are grown and tended by migrant workers who are not treated very well, “so there is a lot of suffering around vegetables, too.”

John McAteer, an ethics faculty member of the Episcopal Diocese of San Diego’s School for Ministry, said that Episcopalians generally consider vegetarianism a matter of personal conscience, “but it is not something theologians and ethicists have come to consensus about.”

The issue PETA raises about lobster boil fundraisers essentially involves such questions as whether or not it is possible to “torture” a lobster “or whether they are below the level of sentience that gives them that sort of ethical status. In other words, is it unethical to eat lobsters?”

While lobsters seem to react when placed into pots of boiling water and try to crawl out, “their brains aren’t developed enough to know what a pot is or understand that they need to crawl out,” he said. The question of whether crustaceans feel pain has been the subject of much research.

“PETA is against eating any animal, so I don’t think it is really about lobsters for them,” McAteer said. “If we stopped having lobster boils, they would come at us for having barbecues next.”

The organization has asked U.S. Roman Catholic bishops to end the practice of Lenten fish fries. It has also called Christians to a “ham-free” Easter.

“Ethically speaking, there is a much better case for eating lobster than for eating pork, beef or even chicken,” McAteer said. “Unless you’re a full-on vegetarian, then I don’t think a lobster boil should cause you any ethical problem.”

— The Rev. Pat McCaughan is a correspondent for the Episcopal News Service. She is based in Los Angeles.


Comments (16)

  1. Jeffrey Cox says:

    As the lobster….

  2. Jeffrey Cox says:

    I meant…ask the lobster….

  3. Jan Robitscher says:

    Someone once asked (and I never forgot)–But what about the screaming vegetables? Yes, even plants feel pain. We were created omnivores and we need food to live and anything we eat will cause pain somewhere along the food chain. I am much more concerned about over-fishing.

  4. Elizabeth Searle says:

    Yep – just as people justified vivisection for years (because animals didn’t feel pain) and cosmetics companies and producers of consumer goods still justify invasive testing of animals on, I guess, the same rationale. It’s part of some cultures to make a money sport of animals fighting each other to the death. Would that be okay for churches if the proceeds were used for good causes? I expect the church to make decisions based on more sensitive criteria than “it’s part of our culture” and “everybody does it” and “there’s no clear consensus in the scientific world…”. The fact that many scientists, theologians and ethicists have concluded that animals, including crustaceans, clearly feel pain and can suffer should, at the least, require critical, focused thinking on our part.

  5. Jim Cutshall says:

    So when are we going to worry about the lost souls?
    We done seem to focus on what we are called to do but instead, what is politically correct.
    Where is our leadership and when will those who publish this stuff going to focus on things that we are called to do.

  6. The Reverend Adrian A. Amaya says:

    Really? Big bugs with barely a nervous system don’t care. Sheesh…

  7. Sr. Dawna Clare Sutton, CG says:

    Personally, I do not agree with PETA about Lobsters and I will continue to enjoy them or shrimp, and other kinds of fish. I am not interested in being a vegetarian, but I do eat lots of them along with my fish and meat and ham. What I do is thank God for her gracious bounty, and mother earth for her gift of food and I thank the Lobster/fish/mammal for being there to nourish us. You PETA and others individuals might watch “Avatar” for another way of looking at us all being part of the whole even the fish and mammals that we eat. It is all in one’s personal perspective. I appreciate and respect your perspective, please respect and appreciate mine.

  8. Scott McDonald says:

    As a church, we have many more issues to worry about
    I appreciate the concern but as I remember, Jesus broke bread with the Apostles.
    They were fisherman! What is next? Maybe the pore defenseless
    Wine grapes? Let’s get back to saving souls.

  9. I am glad someone is considering ALL God’s creatures. 💔

  10. Kevin Miller says:

    PETA takes things too far. This is one example for me. Eating meat is not in itself bad. It’s when we do it irresponsibly that it becomes a problem.

    And yes, Jesus’s first followers were FISHERMEN!

  11. Louise Bower says:

    This is not a carefully thought out theological position but I do remember being told once that “the Land of milk and honey” was so-called because milk and honey are the only two foods that can be harvested without killing something. Even plants must be killed in order to be eaten. So, if we are going to use the criteria of avoiding killing foods to eat them, we’ll be living on milk and honey – not my idea of a balanced diet!! As I said, this is not a well considered theological or ethical position, merely an observation —

  12. john Williamson says:

    I am a member of “peta” — People eating Tasty Animals.

  13. P.J. Cabbiness says:

    Lobsters are delicious and meant to be consumed by us. The fact that we are having this discussion borders on the pathetic. Enough of this madness.

  14. Arthur E. House says:

    Jesus distributed loaves and FISHES. Peter and Andrew were FISHermen, and on at least one occasion, our Lord intervened to make a great catch for them. After His resurrection, Jesus ate FISH to show that he was alive in bodily form.

    The fact that this nonsense about lobsters is even considered sufficiently newsworthy to appear in an ENS release shows again how a once revered and universal church continues to slide into an ever greater chasm of socio-political hysterics. Social Justice for lobsters?

    God bless the good people who take those creatures, and offer the proceeds of their bounty to causes serving the needy.

  15. The Rev. Bret B. Hays says:

    “Arise, Peter; slay and eat.”

  16. Paul Tunkle says:

    A simple and compassionate technique involves dropping live lobsters into a pool of fresh water. They slowly die in a few minutes and then can be boiled. I am a Mainer and we eat plenty of lobsters.

Comments are closed.