Majority of primates call for temporary Episcopal Church sanctions

By Matthew Davies
Posted Jan 14, 2016
The primates of the Anglican Communion pray during Evensong in Canterbury Cathedral on Jan. 11, the first day of their five day meeting. Photo: Canterbury Cathedral

The primates of the Anglican Communion pray during Evensong in Canterbury Cathedral on Jan. 11, the first day of their five-day meeting. Photo: Canterbury Cathedral

[Episcopal News Service — Canterbury, England] A majority of Anglican primates Jan. 14 asked that the Episcopal Church, for a period of three years, “no longer represent us on ecumenical and interfaith bodies, should not be appointed or elected to an internal standing committee and that while participating in the internal bodies of the Anglican Communion, they will not take part in decision making on any issues pertaining to doctrine or polity.”

Expressing their unanimous desire to walk together, the primates said that their call comes in response to the decision by the Episcopal Church’s General Convention last July to change canonical language that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman (Resolution A036) and authorize two new marriage rites with language allowing them to be used by same-sex or opposite-sex couples (Resolution A054).

An announcement posted on the Primates 2016 meeting website said that “the Primates agreed how they would walk together in the grace and love of Christ.”

“This agreement acknowledges the significant distance that remains but confirms their unanimous commitment to walk together,” the announcement, which includes the full text of the primates’ call, said. The announcement also said the agreement “demonstrates the commitment of all the Primates to continue the life of the Communion with neither victor nor vanquished.”

Before the Jan. 14 vote, Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Michael B. Curry told the primates gathering Jan. 11-15 in Canterbury, England, that the statement calling for the sanctions would be painful for many in the Episcopal Church to receive.

“Many of us have committed ourselves and our church to being ‘a house of prayer for all people,’ as the Bible says, when all are truly welcome,” Curry said in remarks he later made available to Episcopal News Service. “Our commitment to be an inclusive church is not based on a social theory or capitulation to the ways of the culture, but on our belief that the outstretched arms of Jesus on the cross are a sign of the very love of God reaching out to us all. While I understand that many disagree with us, our decision regarding marriage is based on the belief that the words of the Apostle Paul to the Galatians are true for the church today: All who have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female, for all are one in Christ.

“For so many who are committed to following Jesus in the way of love and being a church that lives that love, this decision will bring real pain,” he added. “For fellow disciples of Jesus in our church who are gay or lesbian, this will bring more pain. For many who have felt and been rejected by the church because of who they are, for many who have felt and been rejected by families and communities, our church opening itself in love was a sign of hope. And this will add pain on top of pain.”

Curry told the primates that he was in no sense comparing his own pain to theirs, but “I stand before you as your brother. I stand before you as a descendant of African slaves, stolen from their native land, enslaved in a bitter bondage, and then even after emancipation, segregated and excluded in church and society. And this conjures that up again, and brings pain.

“The pain for many will be real. But God is greater than anything. I love Jesus and I love the church. I am a Christian in the Anglican way. And like you, as we have said in this meeting, I am committed to ‘walking together’ with you as fellow primates in the Anglican family.”

The primates’ statement also asks Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby to appoint a task group “to maintain conversation among ourselves with the intention of restoration of relationship, the rebuilding of mutual trust, healing the legacy of hurt, recognizing the extent of our commonality, and exploring our deep differences, ensuring they are held between us in the love and grace of Christ.”

The announcement about the sanctions said that further comments would be made and questions answered at a 3 p.m. local time news conference Jan. 15.

The first two days of the gathering were given solely to setting the agenda for the week and focusing on whether the primates could reach an agreement on how to move forward despite their differences of opinion concerning theological interpretation and human sexuality issues.

A widely anticipated exodus of some conservative African archbishops has not come to pass and all but one primate remain at the table during the Jan. 11-15 meeting, committed to ongoing dialogue and discerning various options towards reconciliation. Archbishop Stanley Ntagali of the Anglican Church of Uganda quietly left the meeting on Jan. 12. He had said in a statement prior to the gathering that he would leave unless “discipline and godly order” were restored in the Anglican Communion. In a Jan. 13 letter to his church, Ntagali said he left because the Ugandan provincial assembly had resolved not to participate in any official communion meetings until that order was restored.

ENS learned from one archbishop that on Wednesday morning the primates took a vote that would have asked the Episcopal Church to withdraw voluntarily from the Anglican Communion for a period of three years. The vote failed by 15 to 20, although such a withdrawal is not in keeping with the processes of provincial membership as outlined in the constitution of the Anglican Consultative Council, the Communion’s main policy-making body. The ACC is already scheduled to meet April 8-20 in Lusaka, Zambia.

Archbishop Foley Beach, the leader of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), has been gathering with the primates for conversation throughout the week but not participating in any of the votes. Beach was invited by Welby in an effort to avert a boycott from conservative African archbishops such as the one that occurred at the last Primates Meeting in 2011. ACNA is composed largely of former Episcopalians who chose to break away from the Episcopal Church. Some African primates have declared their affiliation to ACNA.

By Wednesday afternoon, the agenda had moved onto other pressing issues affecting the Anglican Communion, such as relief and development work, and its response to war and conflict.

Curry, who was installed as the Episcopal Church’s presiding bishop and primate last November, is attending his first gathering of primates.

Following his election in June 2015, Curry said the Anglican Communion is as much about relationships and partnerships as it is about structure and organization. “We’ve got some work to do; we’ve got some Jesus work to do,” he said. “This world is crying out for us and it needs us, and the Anglican Communion is one way that God uses us together to really make this a better world.”

Primates are the senior archbishops and presiding bishops elected or appointed to lead each of the 38 autonomous provinces of the Anglican Communion. They are invited to the Primates Meetings by the Archbishop of Canterbury to consult on theological, social and international issues.

The Anglican Communion Primates Meeting is one of the three instruments of communion, the other two being the Lambeth Conference of bishops and the Anglican Consultative Council, the Communion’s main policy-making body. The Archbishop of Canterbury, as primus inter pares, or “first among equals,” is recognized as the focus of unity for the Anglican Communion.

Each province relates to other provinces within the Anglican Communion by being in full communion with the See of Canterbury. The Archbishop of Canterbury calls the Lambeth Conference, chairs the meeting of primates and is president of the ACC.

In some Anglican provinces the primate is called archbishop and/or metropolitan, while in others the term presiding bishop – or as in Scotland, primus – is used.

The Archbishop of Canterbury also invites to the primates meetings the moderators who lead the united ecumenical churches of North India, South India and Pakistan.

In 1978 Archbishop Donald Coggan, the 101st Archbishop of Canterbury, established the Primates Meeting as an opportunity for “leisurely thought, prayer and deep consultation.”

The primates have met in Ely, England, in 1979; Washington, D.C., in 1981; Limuru, Kenya, in 1983; Toronto, Canada, in 1986; Cyprus in 1989; Newcastle, Northern Ireland, in 1991; Cape Town, South Africa, in 1993; Windsor, England, in 1995; Jerusalem in 1997; Oporto, Portugal, in 2000; Kanuga Conference Center, Hendersonville, North Carolina, in 2001; Canterbury, England, in 2002; Gramodo, Brazil, in May 2003; London, England, in October 2003; Newry, Northern Ireland, in February 2005; Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in February 2007; Alexandria, Egypt, in February 2009; and Dublin, Ireland, in January 2011.

The provinces and primates of the Anglican Communion are listed here.

Visit the official Primates 2016 website

Follow @Primates2016 on Twitter

— Matthew Davies is an editor/reporter for the Episcopal News Service.


Tags


Comments (231)

  1. Lynnly Busler Marcotte says:

    As a ‘cradle’ Episcopalian, I have two thoughts:

    1. How much is the fine that we should probably pay over three years?

    2. What would Jesus say???

  2. Michele K. Waite says:

    I am so saddened to read of this news. I am saddened that we continue to place ‘labels’ on another human being. I am saddened that MY church, the church I so love, the people I so love, are seemingly regressing and forgetting the message of Christ. Love one another! Simply put. LOVE ONE ANOTHER AS I HAVE LOVED YOU! Just DO IT! DO IT without judgment. Please! We can be a WONDERFUL example to this WORLD! Please listen. Please!

  3. Christi Hll says:

    I am proud to be an Episcopalian and will be part of this church to the end of my days. We follow the teachings of Christ to love(in agape*) one another, to support each other without regard for our differences. We work very hard to include rather than exclude. Our convention delegates that voted to allow same sex marriage had three years in which to poll their diocesan people ,ponder the significance of supporting all those who want to publicly confirm their love for each othe.r
    * I refer you ‘The Four Loves’ by C.S. Lewis

  4. Tig Soliac says:

    I am glad to see that a governing body can stand up for principles of moral, eternal truth. I am afraid that many Protestant churches have come to believe the truth is something they can vote on… Who are these people that say that we should vote certain commandments of the Lord in or out with the times?…These are perilous times indeed.

  5. David Veal says:

    Is this the way a true Apostolic Council operates? Did the Apostles at the Jerusalem Council decide to throttle and exclude those who continued to practice circumcision? Or was it the other way around… Did those who continued to practice circumcision abandon the fellowship of those who did not? Real catholic authority adjusts to meet changing understandings and an ever changing environment with new patterns of discipline… “New occasions teach new duties, time makes ancient good uncouth”… as those Americans said who found slavery repugnant to their consciences, but found that Holy Scripture, read in a mindless, nonspiritual way, did not adequately address it. Let the men who wear the hoods at Canterbury rage on… many of them are people we dearly love and they ARE ALL TRYING TO FUNCTION RIGHTLY AS OUR FATHERS IN GOD. Things turn ugly when they try to exercise imperium, but force is not of God. In time, the victor in this struggle will be the consensus fidelum…the mind of Christ still dwells in his Church and the Holy Spirit will still guide us, even through the times of most difficult change.
    Let us fear not. No council can squelch the Spirit or extinguish the truth, and on the other hand, no prophet who does not speak the will of the Eternal One in love will ultimately endure. Perhaps we should all recall the advice of Gamliei, Acts 5:38-39.

  6. Tracy Lawrence says:

    The Episcopal church has gone off the deep end raising LGBT issues and issues of the secular Progressive left to the very top of its agenda. There is diversity among members and part of that is political diversity. I don’t see any respect or desire to include those who have more traditional Christian values and beliefs, which is probably why so many people have left. That is not inclusive. I understand that it’s important for Gays to feel welcome; but what about all those Episcopalians who continue to believe that the sacrament of marriage was intended for a man and a woman. Are they allowed to feel welcome too? The Anglican Communion has rightly recognized that the best place for the LGBT crusade is in the political arena and not in the front pew of the local Episcopal Church. Speaking as someone who is tolerant, or was tolerant, I am just plain tired of hearing about it at this point.

    1. CRCook says:

      Well spoken Tracy.

    2. Mandy crume says:

      Ok you say it sooooo much better then I did! Thats what I was trying to say but I tryed to hard not to step on too many toes but did anyway Sorry!
      Well said thank you!

  7. Mary K. Fields says:

    These will be the longest three years and a very painful period. I am sure that you consider what you have done to be the best thing for your church but it no longer is mine. You have set a great divide that will split us more and more. It is no longer MY church and that makes me sad. Whether or not I ever consider myself to be a part of you again remains to be seen.

    Remember, JUDGE NOT LEAST YE BE JUDGED.

  8. Vicki Gray says:

    How incredibly sad the decision today of the Anglican primates choosing “discipline and godly order” over love and compassion. In this moment, I treasure the loving, compassionate response of our Presiding Bishop Michael Curry and pledge him my solidarity in the Jesus work we have before us.

    And, about the money that sticks in the craw of so many, keep it flowing – not for the palaces, Lambeth included, not for the empty cathedrals, not for the travel expenses of the high and mighty, but for the least among us who have a just claim on our abundance.

  9. Lenny Sparks says:

    “Curry told the primates that he was in no sense comparing his own pain to theirs” and then he dropped the race card, as a gesture of pious suffering. Class act, Curry.

  10. JC Fisher says:

    Roy, Air Force Maj. Adrianna Vorderbruggen was killed in combat in Afghanistan just last month: a married lesbian (also a parent). Patriotism and bravery know no barriers in terms of sexual orientation; I’m glad our Church, TEC, is open to all of them!

  11. Mark Orman says:

    The poem about the circle is wonderful! So glad you helped me discover it.

    While I am very much a believer that we in the ECUSA have done the right thing in including all people in the authorization of the right to marry ( even though my own bishop forbids it to us here), I do understand the feelings of the primates who are standing against us. Perhaps it is the fact that I was brought up in a very conservative, fundamentalist church. The Primates are just as convinced as we are . To them, it is wrong, it is forbidden, it is contrary to the will of God. We can not change their minds or their hearts by being less than contrite about the fact that we have offended their REAL beliefs. you all know that love for Christ and for others will overcome in the end:

    4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

    8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away.

  12. David H. Brown says:

    We are called to love one another. Those in sin as well as those who are faithful. Where we are to love is not a call to accept the sin, but to accept the sinner. Especially, not to facilitate it. By God’s own Word we are told that homosexuality is a sin. Does that mean we should turn them away from our churches? Absolutely not. However, that does not mean marriage of two people of the same sex should be done as part of accepting someone gay into the church. I would ask you, if those born with sickness or disease are afflicted, are not also those who say they are born, or “hardwired” gay, not also afflicted and need Christ to remove that affliction just as Jesus removed so many others? So very often we just want to be comfortable in a “church of good feelings”, that doesn’t ask the hard questions or tell the hard truth. These churches do a disservice to the body of Christ, by being the very stumbling blocks Jesus warned us against being.

  13. David Shepherd says:

    From a single post, Jimmy Green (presumably exercising some sort of the charism of discernment of spirits) wrote of Wlliem H Swanepoel:
    ‘no self-respecting gay person uses the pathologizing neologism “experience(s) same sex attraction” which was hatched out of the bowels of the ex-gay movement and reduces gay from a rich ontological, comprehensive identity, grounded in said attraction’

    How wonderfully inclusive! (Sarcasm off)

    So, on the basis of a single comment, a gay man who exercise celibacy is diagnosed as lacking in self-respect for not considering LGBT identity to be rich and comprehensive (although exhibiting fluidity according to the APA and Lisa Diamond) and a hostage to right-wing religious culture warriors!

    De Torquemada would have been proud of such a summary conviction without trial for ‘heresy’!

  14. Sam Meyer says:

    Distressing news. The Church should keep talking, keep convening, keep celebrating with the Anglican Communion, and should continue to send its unrestricted $1.2M block grant to the Anglican Communion Office this triennium as budgeted & planned. (Though, I can see why some might want to decline to give to an organization which has acted to punish a church that inclusively offers sacraments to all. Especially when that organization ignores that the push for sanctions was led by bishops who support the criminalization of sexual orientation.) I remain glad and proud that I am Episcopalian, that the Episcopal Church Welcomes You, and I continue to give thanks for Presiding Bishop Curry’s ministry and example. In our baptismal covenants, we’re charged to “seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself.” As Jonathan Martin put it recently, “The emphasis is not on sharing dogma so much as it is sharing the cup.” We don’t own the table; rather, it’s our gift to share.

  15. Margery Harper says:

    I am not gay, but a Christian who is aware of my origins I have not committed any crime, but I feel we need to remind ourselves that we all come from a sinful nature and no amount of pomp and bluffing changes that. I don’t really know any gay people, but my opinion is that they can’t be any worse than the rest of us. Praise the Lord who gives us eternal life through faith.

  16. Marceline Donaldson says:

    I don’t know why anyone is surprised, sad, confused, hurting over this. Don’t you know your own history? Is this any different? Is this a change from our history, which we glorify?

    Is this any different from the way the Episcopal Church in the United States acted over the ordination of women? When the movement became strong enough and a small handful of American Bishops decided to go against the Episcopal Church and ordain women was the reaction of the Episcopal Church any different? Wasn’t there a trial over this? And pushing out of clergy and bishops over this? How does that differ from what we did in the Episcopal Church to God’s people?

    When those called “Black” or “African Americans” were excluded from attending the Episcopal Church because of the color of their skin and/or their African ancestors was that any different? The liberal Churches amongst us allowed those “Blacks” who insisted on being Episcopalian to either attend Episcopal Churches which were all “Black” or to sit in the balcony of those liberal Churches which would allow such – was that any different? The plantation moved into the Episcopal Churches in the United States.

    Is it any surprise that the person who walked out of this “meeting” was African? Or that the Bishops who are available to preside over the Churches in America leaving the Episcopal Church because of the issues of the ordination of women and the inclusion of gays as full members with the right to marry the person of their choice – that they are African?

    Some of those who were discriminated against cannot overcome the self-hatred left by the separatist policies under which they lived for generations. Even when released – sort of – from those policies they cannot get the sin of separation out of their souls.

    Before countering the Anglican Communion’s action the American Episcopal Church needs to rid itself of the sin of the Jim Crowism in which it currently exists. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank that is in your own eye? (Matthew 7:3)

    After the decision of the Episcopal Church sanctioning gay marriage it was clear this action by the Anglican Communion would follow. Sin piled upon sin piled upon sin. And God cried and wondered what good did it do to send God’s Son – what did we do with the gift? Used the fact that God sent’ his’ son to justify our sexism – which we lost no time in institutionalizing with the words of the hymns, the services, the everything that used language in the Church to raise up one sex and diminish another?We lost no time in portraying Jesus as very fair of skin with softly curled blonde/brown hair even though “he” came from an area of the world where ‘he’ was probably dark of skin with very kinky hair.

    And then we took the need of the State, to protect the property and inheritance rights of the 1% into the Church as the sacrament of marriage and have held it as totally inviolable between a man and a woman and are now using that to divide us and keep our identities, one over the other, as better than – God forgive us!

    1. Tracy Lawrence says:

      So, if an Anglican doesn’t support same sex marriage and they happen to be black it is because they are “self-hating”over the Church’s past racist sins? This seems like a real stretch to me and insulting to Black Africans. Folks in the TEC who are strongly in support of same sex marriage need to accept that there are many Christians who are not, and that being loving in the way that Christ taught us, does not necessarily include gays and lesbians being married in the TEC. Jesus didn’t actually weigh in on the issue at all. Progressive Liberals in the TEC are asserting that to be loving and to live the way Christ taught us, we must embrace your political agenda and rewrite the Sacrament of Marriage. Not necessarily so. All of that is based on opinion and political activism; not scripture. I don’t know who polled whom during years leading up to the votes that took place at the recent Convention. But, I will say that most of the folks at my Church in MA are not wrapped up in TEC politics and have no idea what goes on or why.

  17. Robert Johnson says:

    A question from an outsider who loves the Episcopal Church because my Boy Scout Troop growing up was sponsored by an Episcopal Church that was at the end of the Street I grew up on. Loved it. Anyway, my question; is the what is called “The Episcopal Church” (TEC) in the US the same as I knew as the Protestant Episcopal Church? Also, I remember growing up several Episcopal Churches in my hometown being ‘different from one another. St Pauls,s was Prayer Book of…., where St Francis was more “modern” and Christ’s Church was “almost Catholic”(I’m guessing Anglican Communion”. I only mean this question sincerely and with the greatest respect. Thank you.

    1. Neil Paynter says:

      Robert, your question strikes me to be very on topic. The Episcopal Church and Protestant Episcopal Church are one in the same. The Church holds that religious practices should be correct, but that doesn’t mean they need to be the exactly same. Unity is not uniformity. Thus we have plain churches and ornate churches; some with quiet services, and some with smells and bells; texts used in worship vary, but the essential content remains. Likewise, beyond accepting the theology of the Apostle’s and Nicene creeds, lay Episcopalians are free to interpret Christianity as they see fit. Sometimes this creates conflict, as interpretations do change over time, and for different people at different rates. We aim to resolve conflict deliberately and collaboratively. This takes time. One of the things that marks us as Episcopalians, is that we pray together even when we don’t agree.

    2. Bruce Michaud+ says:

      PECUSA was dropped because “Protestant’ seemed a misnomer for a church so “Catholic” in its worship and order. As for your hometown Episcopal churches, it seems they were “high”, “broad”, and “low”. These adjectives are most commonly used in the States with respect to the manner in which worship is conducted – e.g., high churches would employ sanctus bells and incense, whereas low churches would not.

  18. Tracy Lawrence says:

    You are exactly right. What the Episcopal Church has done in the last 20 years is not inclusive at all. Inclusivity and tolerance is living with the difference. Not demanding that the interest, rights and views of a particular faction be elevated above all others. That is exclusion. I would also like to say that the right to same sex marriage is the law of the land. The Supreme Court has made it’s ruling. The votes that were taken in Salt Lake last summer were really just kicking the extra point and forcing the LGBT political agenda on all Episcopalians. This goes way beyond asking to be welcome. This is pushing in and taking over. I think some boundaries are in order here as is a recognition that there is a lot more to TEC than the civil rights agenda. Isn’t there?

    1. Jay Mullinix says:

      Tracy,

      I have to agree with you. I fear that in many places (certainly not all, praise God) the Episcopal Church has become a sort of chaplaincy for a specific set: educated upper-middle class (usually) whites looking to continue their euphoric 1960s rebellion against a perceived establishment (usually identified as politically and theologically conservative and traditionalist) As an Episcopalian I am genuinely saddened by this turn of events, but at the same time the responsibility for it lies squarely and firmly on our own shoulders. We are not being bullied or persecuted. Far from it. We are the ones who have acted contrary to the spirit of true Communion and mutual relationship and tried to force the rest of the entire Anglican Communion to accommodate us. To be in relationship and communion implies accountability to the other. To be Catholic (and we do still claim to believe in and practice catholicity) means you give up the right to innovate, no matter how good of an idea you may think the innovation is; that you acknowledge that we can discuss anything but that the church makes its decisions together. Over and over and over again the other provinces (and not just the Africans. They are certainly the most spoken of and singled out by those pushing the progressive agenda but they are far from alone) have pleaded with us not to continue the path we are pursuing, telling us this is not the mind of the wider Communion and asking us to consider the effect of our actions on more than just ourselves. We have decided we can do what we want, act in counter-distinction to the wider Communion (to say nothing of the overwhelming majority of the rest of worldwide Christianity and, more, the whole 2000 year history of the church) and that we should not be accountable to those we are in relationship with for this, that they should just accept it. We have acted individually and self-autonomously. This is certainly very American, but it is in no way Catholic.

  19. Anthony says:

    Scripture being understood by the tradition of the Church is the very reason why the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church does not embrace the homosexual lifestyle as God’s desire for his people. Language of “my Church” and likening this meeting to an Apostolic Council I think gets at the real issue, which is HUBRIS. If the Episcopal Church can do whatever it wants without the consent of Rome or the Orthodox, then it has become sectarian and no better than the worst kind of fundamentalism. I believe that the Episcopal Church should leave the Anglican Communion and become its own entity. The TEC obviously knows more than their brothers and sisters in Rome, the Orthodox Church, and those primitive Anglicans in places like Africa. American Exceptionalism now has a theological home in the TEC and your religion can function unfettered in the good ole U.S.A. The new motto: “The Episcopal Church Welcomes You to a Brave New World.” Good luck with that!

  20. J Reaves says:

    I recently joined the Episcopal Church after being a United Methodist for many, many years. I have come to love TEC, its mission and ministry, its people, its values.
    While I am religious, I am also pragmatic. I have heard some theories that the vote of the majority of primates to sanction TEC is not religious at all but a power grab. It may well be. I also hope the members of the Anglican Communion that voted for these sanction expect the money to keep flowing. While some have argued passionately that cutting the money off would be un-Christian, I feel anyone who makes a decision should be willing to accept the consequences. Also, wouldn’t any money from TEC be “tainted” because of our supposed sins? Just askin’.
    In the four Gospels, Jesus mentioned homosexuality exactly zero times. He did mention divorce. The only mention of homosexuality in the New Testament is by Paul, and he thought at least under some circumstances men and women shouldn’t get married. The condemnation of homosexuality is in the Hebrew Scriptures. Along with the condemnation of homosexuality are rules against planting different crops together, working on the Sabbath, rules for selling your daughter into slavery, etc. You get the idea.

  21. Evelyn Piety says:

    I woke up this morning knowing that the first thing I needed to do was to re-read the remarkable and, in my opinion awesome, document “To Set Our Hope on Christ.” Although written about 10 years ago, it is still relevant and I think those on all sides of the current discussion would benefit from reading it. A copy may be found here: http://archive.episcopalchurch.org/documents/ToSetOurHope_eng.pdf
    Grace and peace to all!

  22. Don McCleary says:

    The reality is that many informed Episcopalians have already left the Anglican Communion as the Primates of the Global South and ACNA do not speak for the TEC or for that matter the Church of Canada. TEC can now use the money it sends to Canterbury and to the other provinces of the Anglican Communion to those churches that welcome TEC’s financial assistance and are open to our church’s inclusiveness. I thank the Bishops of TEC for standing together on the issues that have led to this sad turn of events. We can use the funds we would otherwise send to other provinces to support missions and programs here and in places that are open to our vision.

  23. Grace Dalton says:

    The tragedy is that all this discussion about sexuality is detracting from the spread of the Gospel. Satan is using the Western world’s obsession with sex get in the way of many people ever considering Christianity. Human relationships in this life time, though important, are nothing compared to the eternal and immeasurable relationship that we have with can have with God – and yet so, so many people don’t even give Him a second thought because they hate Christianity on account of the sexuality issue. It shouldn’t matter – not when eternal life hangs in the balance.

  24. E.A. Garrett says:

    What are the angry Primates going to do when the Anglican Church of Canada, the Scottish Episcopal Church, the Anglican Church of Australia, the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia, the Anglican Church of Southern Africa, the Church in Wales and even the Church of England join us in recognizing same sex marriages as is the civil law in the majority of those places.

    Quite frankly for me I’m more concerned about being in communion with the above provinces than with those of the angry voices.

Comments are closed.