Church, interfaith leaders call for US government to end its immigration policy separating families

General Convention to consider additional legislation on immigration, migration

By Lynette Wilson
Posted Jun 12, 2018

Outside of City Hall in Los Angeles on June 7, people hold signs to protest against President Donald Trump’s executive order to detain children crossing the southern U.S. border, which separates families. Photo: Patrick T. Fallon/REUTERS

[Episcopal News Service] In mid-May, a Honduran man who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border into southeast Texas with his wife and 3-year-old son committed suicide at a county jail, where after requesting asylum, border agents told him he’d be separated from his family.

Family separations aren’t just happening at the border, roundups are happening nationwide. In early June, in Seattle, Washington, 206 undocumented immigrants apprehended at the border and held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody – 174 of the women, at least half of them mothers – were transferred to a detention facility near the airport. Somewhere along their journey, the mothers were separated from their children. Some weren’t given the chance to say goodbye and could hear their children screaming in a nearby room; some don’t know their children’s whereabouts. Most, though not all, of the women fled ongoing gang and domestic violence in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, three of the most violent countries in the world.

Unaccompanied minors and families from Central America began arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border in record numbers in 2014. The numbers later dropped off, but there’s a new surge happening now at the Southwest border where Customs and Border Control agents have detained more than 252,000 people – 32,371 unaccompanied minors and 59,113 families – over the last eight months. There are some 11,000 unaccompanied minors in federal custody.

On June 11, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions further clarified the Trump administration’s immigration policy saying gang violence and domestic abuse are not grounds for asylum, overturning a precedent set in 2016 by the Department of Justice’s Federal Board of Immigration Appeals.

In early April, Sessions announced that anyone caught crossing the border illegally or attempting to cross the border illegally would be criminally prosecuted. Then, on May 7, during a speech in San Diego, Sessions clarified the zero-tolerance policy, stating it includes separating children and parents.

“Immigrants should ask to apply lawfully before they enter our country,” said Sessions. “Citizens of other countries don’t get to violate our laws or rewrite them for us. People around the world have no right to demand entry in violation of our sovereignty.”

To carry out the new enforcement policies, Sessions sent 35 prosecutors to the Southwest and moved 18 immigration judges to the border.

On June 6, a federal judge in San Diego refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union challenging the Trump administration’s immigration policy by saying family separation may violate the Constitution’s due process clause. The judge did, however, dismiss a separate challenge saying that the practice violates asylum laws.

Entering or attempting to enter the United States illegally, however, and requesting asylum are not one in the same.

Under international law, people fleeing violence and persecution have the right to request asylum. The Episcopal Church has a longstanding policy affirming the universal right to seek asylum; it recognizes the need to protect vulnerable people.

Last week, Presiding Bishop Michael Curry signed an ecumenical and interfaith statement expressing concerns over a recent U.S. government policy “calling for more stringent enforcement of federal immigration laws.” A policy, they say, will likely result in an increase in family separations.

“I really appreciated that Bishop Curry signed the statement … decrying the separation of families in faith-based terms,” said longtime immigration advocate Sarah Lawton, who chairs the House of Deputies’ General Convention Social Justice and International Policy Committee and is a lay deputy from the Diocese of California. “I appreciate that he recognized that we, as Christians, as Episcopalians, respect the family as one of the fundamental building blocks of society and recognize that in our own sacraments.”

That the United States would deploy a punitive policy separating families at the border – taking children and not telling their parents where they are going in some cases, not allowing them to say goodbye – to deter asylum seekers is unimaginable, she said, in a phone call with Episcopal News Service.

“It’s so cruel, depraved really. They don’t need to do that. … Under international law, they have the right to make an asylum claim,” said Lawton. “We should all be on the phone – out in the streets – calling our legislators. U.S. policy has been in crisis for a long time; it has intensified under Trump and has become more racist. The administration is going after the low-hanging fruit, families that are registered [in government tracking systems]. It’s a terror that’s descending on families. As a church, it’s our duty to protect the dignity of every human being.”

The stories of fathers and mothers being separated from their children at the border are deeply disturbing, said Lacy Broemel, the Episcopal Church’s immigration and refugee policy analyst working out of the Washington, D.C.-based Office of Government Relations, in an email to ENS.

“The Office of Government Relations is urging Episcopalians to contact their members of Congress to ask the administration to end this harmful policy of separating families at the border. Our office is sharing the presiding bishop’s statement with members of Congress and meeting with them to share the Episcopal Church’s deep concern about this practice and advocating through the appropriations process to oppose additional funding to detention centers,” she said.

“Further, we are continuing to focus on advocating for larger-scale changes to our immigration policies such as citizenship for Dreamers and other undocumented persons in the U.S., implementing humane and reasonable policies at our border, and addressing the violence and poverty these families are fleeing in their home countries,” said Broemel.

At its 79th General Convention in July in Austin, Texas, the Episcopal Church will consider legislation reinforcing its positions on refugees, immigration and migration, including Resolution D009, which examines the Christian principles for responding to human migration. (The 2015 General Convention passed several resolutions strengthening its position on immigration and refugees.)

Convention will look not only to respond to the current migration crisis, but also to adopt a long-term response strategy in the United States, as well as in places such as the Dominican Republic, where Haitian migrants often suffer abuse, and in areas where climate change threatens to displace entire communities.

“The Episcopal Church has a long-standing and well-documented history of championing comprehensive immigration reform as well as humanitarian support for refugees,” said the Rt. Rev. Anne Hodges-Copple, bishop suffragan for the Diocese of North Carolina. “The interest and energy for this work is only increasing as our local communities are continuing to be blessed with new neighbors from others countries. The stories of families torn apart and suffering under the current broken immigration system are the stories of families we know from work, school and church.

“Five resolutions on immigration reform have been submitted to the Committee on Social Justice and U.S. Policy so far. We expect more submissions addressing the Justice Department’s policy of separating children from their parents. This pointed departure from decades of previous Republican and Democratic-led administrations’ policies defy any commonly held definition of family values,” she said. “A great gift of General Convention is our resolution process as a way to listen, speak and learn from a wide variety of voices and prayerfully discern a biblically, theologically informed position and call to action.”

Earlier this month, Rebecca Linder Blachly, the director of the Office of Government Relations, signed on to an interfaith statement decrying family separation and urging national leaders to protect family unity.

Churches and religious communities have a constitutional right to petition the government. The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause does not prohibit churches from meeting with, educating or advocating to elected officials with the aim of creating laws in line with the churches’ values. Throughout U.S. history, religious communities have engaged politically on issues of the era: from abolition to civil rights movements to immigration reform.

The Office of Government Relations – housed on Capitol Hill – carries out the church’s nonpartisan, values-based agenda. Every three years, the Episcopal Church’s General Convention meets to conduct church-related business and to discuss and pass legislation ranging from revisions of the Book of Common Prayer to resolutions supporting criminal justice and immigration reform. Episcopalians can join the Episcopal Public Policy Network to become involved in this work.

To write your elected officials to request they defend access to asylum, click here.

In May, the Office of Government Relations hosted a webinar on immigration policies and advocacy titled “Loving Your Neighbor: Faithful Actions on Immigration.” Click here to watch it.

— Lynette Wilson is a reporter and managing editor of the Episcopal News Service. She can be reached at


Full names required. Read our Comment Policy. General comments and suggestions about Episcopal News Service, as well as reports of commenting misconduct, can be e-mailed to Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments (9)

  1. Timothy A. Spong says:

    “Entering or attempting to enter the United States illegally, however, and requesting asylum are not one in the same.”

    Attention, Lynette Wilson: the proper expression is “one and the same,” not “one in the same.”

    With that out of the way, I heartily endorse the thrust of this article. As soon as I have posted this comment, I intend to “click [t]here” to write to my elected officials to request they defend access to asylum.

  2. Jim Cutshall says:

    Seems they could have asked to stay in Mexico or the first border after leaving their country if they were afraid. Ever think about that?

    1. Richard D. Thorn says:

      “On June 11, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions further clarified the Trump administration’s immigration policy saying gang violence and domestic abuse are not grounds for asylum, overturning a precedent set in 2016 by the Department of Justice’s Federal Board of Immigration Appeals.”
      Empathy yes. But I am sure our readers are well enough informed that there hardly exists a country in this hemisphere that doesn’t have gang violence. Non governmental gang violence subjects our borders to be open to anyone from a country run by thugs. Furthermore non government sponsored domestic violence is something we in the US can not police in other countries. We can’t police it here.
      32000 unaccompanied minors ?
      How is that working ?
      Follow up studies will show that some child traders , not relatives of these kids, got their grubby hands on these children. Another unintended consequence of a failed immigration policy.

  3. Larry Waters says:

    Jim Cutshall has a great idea. Seek asylum in countries near to the ones they are leaving. We, meaning U.S. citizens, cannot support all these people-I am sorry. Moreover, gang violence from South American countries is here in the U.S. The situation of people having to flee their countries is terrible; but rather than add more folks to the U.S., perhaps our churches, if not already, could work to change the conditions in these horrible countries-pressure the source of people’s woes- the governments of those countries.

  4. Joe Parrish says:

    The difficulty of keeping families together is that detention centers are tantamount to federal prisons, except those with and without felony convictions are housed together; men are separated from women; and children go to motels, with a mother usually if they are minor children, or more likely they are not housed; economics are a factor.

  5. Terry Francis says:

    There is always going to be gang violence in Central and South America. That is never going to end. As desperate as these families may be, this country cannot allow countless thousands of them to come flooding across our borders. Our schools, our clinics and our social services are already strained to the breaking point because of the ones already here. ICE and the AJ are simply enforcing the law. If parents didn’t want to be separated from their children then they shouldn’t have crossed illegally into the country to begin with. Only a progressive would consider enforcment of immigration law to be “cruel and depraved”. Only a progressive would praise and support sanctuary cities whose leftward leaning politicians all but give the Trump administration the middle finger in their defiance of immigration law enforcement. The scary part is Christian progressives see nothing wrong in totally surrendering our sovernty in the name of “compassion”. TEC does not champion immigration reform. It champions open borders.

    1. Matt Ouellette says:

      Strict enforcement of immigration law is “cruel and depraved” because many of those immigration laws are “cruel and depraved,” like separating children from their parents. That’s why progressives have tried to get Congress to change those laws. But of course, any time this is suggested, conservatives like yourself accuse us of wanting to offer amnesty and of not following the law. So, which is it?
      Also, how is it that you can just callously say that immigrants who don’t want their children ripped away from them to just not cross illegally in the first place? First of all, most undocumented immigrants did not cross illegally, but overstayed their visas. Second, people who were following the rules and trying to get in legally have also had their children separated from them. This is a real moral issue with our immigration policy, but you appear to shrug it off as if it is nothing. Is defending the current administration more important to you than caring about the welfare of these children and their families?
      Standing up for the welfare of immigrants and their children is not a defense of open boarder policy, but about following Our Lord in being compassionate for the least of these. This shouldn’t be a “progressive” vs. “conservative” issue, but a “right” vs. “wrong” issue. I’m not saying that I have all the answers about how to do it (I’m not sure sanctuary cities are ideal, for example), but we need to do something to change our current draconian immigration laws.

  6. Joe Parrish says:

    It was very sad to learn that the viral picture of a child in a cage was from an event staged by immigration activists in a public square in Texas:
    Such mischievous pictures can significantly weaken efforts to help immigrants.

  7. Bill Louis says:

    Terry, Larry and others bring up good points but what parents send 32,371 “unaccompanied” children thousands of miles with strangers. In this country the children would removed from the parents by child services. The hope is to establish the children in this country so the parents can later join them. The Border authorities wisely separate the children from the adults not know who’s who and prevent housing them with rapists and pedophiles.
    If the Bishops are truly concerned for the children why not lobby for a law that allows their congregants to legally sponsor immigrants and be responsible for their food, clothing, housing and other necessities rather than have all of us “chip in” to share the cost. Wouldn’t that be the Christian thing to do

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *