Liturgy and Music committee offers church a plan to unscramble its calendar of saints

‘Situation of great confusion’ was 10 years in the making

By Mary Frances Schjonberg
Posted Mar 5, 2018

The Standing Committee on Liturgy and Music has spent the 2016-2018 triennium attempting to bring order to the Episcopal Church’s calendar of commemorations. Photo: Church Publishing Inc.

[Episcopal News Service] The church’s calendar of saints has been in a state of extreme flux for years, and the Standing Committee on Liturgy and Music is recommending a way for General Convention to remedy what it calls a “situation of great confusion.”

The SCLM’s proposal is contained in its Blue Book report to convention. The subcommittee report on the calendar can be found via the side navigation.

The committee said in its report that it inherited a “situation of great confusion about what the calendar of the church was, and what General Convention wanted the next steps to be.” The Blue Book report outlines that multiyear confusion.

“The SCLM’s first step was to pause, take a breath, and determine a clear narrative for where our calendar has been, what has happened to it over the past 10 years, and what General Convention asked us to do this triennium,” the Rev. Devon Anderson, SCLM chair, told Episcopal News Service.

“In some instances, the SCLM received conflicting directives from General Convention. Our Calendar Subcommittee, chaired by Liza Anderson, charted the calendar’s past course in order to interpret and engage the work we were asked to do this triennium, and propose a clear path forward for next triennium. So, what you will see in the report is clarity. We have graphs!”

The 2015 General Convention sent the SCLM 11 resolutions related to the church’s various lists of saints that it has chosen to remember and honor. Those resolutions, along with feedback from the church, led the committee to decide that it ought to prepare a new edition of Lesser Feasts and Fasts, which would better reflect the diversity of the church and could work in conjunction with A Great Cloud of Witnesses, which the last General Convention voted to “make available” but did not authorize.

Efforts have been ongoing to create a calendar that reflects the church’s diversity to replace the current list of commemorations that, in the committee’s words, “still skews overwhelmingly clerical, white, and male.” Even the process begun in 2003, which resulted in Holy Women, Holy Men, added 100 commemorations, but they also tended to be white, male clergy.

The SCLM is recommending that convention authorize for optional use its revised version of Lesser Feasts and Fasts, which reflects what it calls “judicious pruning” of names made possible by the idea that A Great Cloud of Witnesses can include some of those names. The report said pruning is needed because convention has been “dramatically increasing the rate at which it adds commemorations, with no signs of slowing down.”

Yet, it said, Episcopalians are concerned about the sheer number of commemorations and their scope, including having multiple choices of people to honor on some days. “Given the inability of the calendar committee to bend space and time in order to create more days in a calendar year, the only solution we see is to keep the commemorations on the main calendar to a manageable number, and to use A Great Cloud of Witnesses to include an even wider scope of individuals,” the SCLM wrote.

The committee also considered the issue of the criteria by which the church decides to include people on the calendar.

“General Convention kicked the calendar back to Lesser Feasts and Fasts, which included the criteria for inclusion in Lesser Feasts and Fasts,” Anderson said. “It also passed a resolution directing SCLM to include former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (and General Convention deputy) Thurgood Marshall on the calendar, with an emphatic ‘Now!’

“But under Lesser Feasts and Fasts’ criteria, Marshall could not be included, as at least two generations have not passed since his death in 1993. Our calendar committee struck the difference, placing Marshall, in addition to Pauli Murray and Florence Li Tim-Oi, on the draft calendar in brackets, and submitted a resolution that the brackets be removed and the three become a permanent part of our calendar.”

The committee recommended that convention authorize Lesser Feasts and Fasts for “optional use throughout the church,” noting that the idea of “trial use” does not canonically apply to anything other than revisions of the Book of Common Prayer. A process of “optional use” with the next iteration of the SCLM monitoring feedback will allow for refinements at the 2021 meeting of convention, the SCLM said.

The members added a caveat, saying that while they recognize the sometimes irresistible “temptation to tinker with the calendar on the floor of convention,” they generally believe that “the church will ultimately have the highest-quality document if significant revisions can wait until the church has had the opportunity to test this new volume, and if all of the anticipated necessary revisions can be accomplished organically rather than by a process of individual resolutions and amendments.”

The committee’s proposed revised Lesser Feasts and Fasts can be found here.

ENS’ previous coverage of the SCLM’s proposals on prayer book revision is here.

The SCLM plans to post on its blog a series of essays about the various projects it worked on during this triennium and will host online discussions there.

– The Rev. Mary Frances Schjonberg is interim managing editor of the Episcopal News Service.


Tags


Comments (6)

  1. As one who was in the midst of the Calendar wars from the late 1970s to the first quarter of this century I wish to express my enthusiasm for the proposed revision of LFF. One minor quibble: I would add ‘Jurist’ to Justice Marshall’s title.

  2. Br. Anselm Philip says:

    I am just as disappointed by this proposal for Lesser Feasts and Fasts as I was with A Great Cloud of Witnesses. I still use Holy Women, Holy Men with my Daily Offices for the following reasons. The Church Year begins with Advent in December with the first Saint honored on November 30th Andrew the Apostle, and ends the following November. I don’t like A Great Cloud of Witnesses and I am not going to use this new book if they are again going to start with January through December. As a matter of the Liturgical Year this is so wrong. Also, the news books have omitted the beautiful daily prayers and Scripture readings for the Weekdays of Lent. It was a very poor decision to omit these. As I said, I won’t use this book. I think it is a terrible version. Add all the Saints you want, but, don’t disturb the great elements of the Church Year to do it.

  3. St. Patrick’s Day on March 18? What other typos are contained herein?

  4. Elizabeth Anderson says:

    The daily prayers and scripture readings for the weekdays of Lent are not in this volume because General Convention 2015 already authorized them, and they were published as a separate volume called “Weekday Eucharistic Propers”. Whether or not one volume or two makes more sense is probably ultimately a decision of Church Publishing, although I’m sure they would be glad to receive feedback from the church. But the reason that these are not being sent to General Convention this year is simply that there are no proposed changes to what the church already authorized and published 3 years ago.

  5. Robert Stiefel says:

    Why was G. F. Handel dropped? He was equally as great a composer for the Church as was Bach. // Also, one of the entries is wrong. Dorothy L. Sayers never allowed her name to appear without the middle initial.

  6. Martin Goshgarian says:

    I remember my surprise, joy, and pride when S. Gregory the Illuminator (now Enlightener) appeared on the Calendar over 50 years ago. My tribe still appreciates how Episcopal parishes offered us a convenient and familiar house of worship. Now it seems Armenia’s loss is Georgia’s gain, with
    more gender parity to boot.

Comments are closed.