Episcopal Church called to a ‘powerful opportunity to exercise our shared baptismal ministry’ with Standing Rock Sioux Nation

Peaceful witness against Dakota Access Pipeline by Missouri River set for Nov. 3

By Mary Frances Schjonberg
Posted Oct 28, 2016

[Episcopal News Service] The Episcopal Church is amplifying the call of the Episcopal community on the Standing Rock Sioux Nation in North Dakota to stand in solidarity and witness with those protecting the tribe’s land and water supply.

Signs from an early action stand stacked in a corner at St. James Episcopal Church in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, near the epicenter of opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Photo: Mary Frances Schjonberg/Episcopal News Service

Signs from an early action stand stacked in a corner at St. James Episcopal Church in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, near the epicenter of opposition to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Photo: Mary Frances Schjonberg/Episcopal News Service

The Rev. John Floberg, supervising priest of the Episcopal churches on the North Dakota side of Standing Rock, has appealed for clergy and laity around the Episcopal Church to come together on the banks of the Missouri River in North Dakota to stand in witness and solidarity on Nov. 3. The current construction route of the Dakota Access Pipeline would run under the river, which is the Sioux Nation’s water supply; over its treaty lands and through sacred areas.

In a statement issued Oct. 28, the Church said Floberg’s appeal came because he and others in North Dakota are “concerned by the increased repression of non-violent water protectors whose ranks include men, women and youth.” The statement also noted that the appeal is “supported by the wisdom of Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II.”

The Nov. 3 action “is being designed to be peaceful, to be prayerful, to be nonviolent and to show the church’s solidarity with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s struggle,” Floberg told Episcopal News Service.

“We’re doing it purposely to not face off against the police,” he said. “We’re providing a witness to the police, we’re providing a witness to DAPL that we’re standing with these tribal people, but we are not making a stand-off with them.”

Since Floberg issued the call on Oct. 23 via email and Facebook, more than 100 clergy have said they would participate, half of them Episcopalians. One hundred clergy was Floberg’s original goal. “That is extremely humbling and I am extremely grateful that the Episcopal Church is answering the call,” he said.

The churchwide support of Floberg’s appeal is rooted in the Church’s continuing support of the protection effort since shortly after it began in earnest in August. That includes last week’s request from the Church’s Executive Council that law-enforcement officials “de-escalate military and police provocation in and near the campsites of peaceful protest and witness of the Dakota Access Pipeline project.”

The Church’s support of the witness appeal comes the day after some pipeline opponents in a recently formed camp were forcibly removed from a camp. The camp was set up Oct. 22 near Highway 1806 and outside of the existing camps on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers land near the Missouri River.

Law-enforcement authorities form a line Oct. 27 as they prepare to evict a new camp of Dakota Access Pipeline opponents from the sides of Highway 1806. Photo: Caroline Grueskin via Twitter

Law-enforcement authorities form a line Oct. 27 as they prepare to evict a new camp of Dakota Access Pipeline opponents from the sides of Highway 1806. Photo: Caroline Grueskin via Twitter

The Morton County Sheriff Department led that action after, it said, its attempt to negotiate with occupants of the new camp failed. Department officers and other law-enforcement officials used, among other things, “a long range acoustic device which sends a high-pitch warning tone” to “control and disperse the crowd of protesters.” Social media reports said the authorities, some of whom were armed with long batons, also used pepper spray and fired small bean bags at protestors.

Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier called the new camp “a public safety issues” because people were blocking county roads and state highways, as well as trespassing on private property. The private land was recently sold to the construction company but the land is also claimed by some as land belonging to the Sioux Nation. And, the ability of nonfamily corporations to own or operate North Dakota farm and ranch land is currently in dispute, further clouding the issue.

The department said late on Oct. 27 that 141 people were arrested during the action to clear the camp and remove a roadblock on a nearby county road. “Officers met violence and resistance including a protester who fired a gun at officers in the police line, protesters who threw Molotov cocktails at them and set vehicles and debris on fire,” the department said.

One supporter of the police action said on the department’s Facebook page that it was good that officials were cleaning out the “vermin.”

An Oct. 27 aerial photo from the Morton County Sheriff Department shows a fire reportedly set by Dakota Access Pipeline project opponents on County Road 134. Photo: Morton County Sheriff Department via Facebook

An Oct. 27 aerial photo from the Morton County Sheriff Department shows a fire reportedly set by Dakota Access Pipeline project opponents on County Road 134. Photo: Morton County Sheriff Department via Facebook

As the police action was unfolding the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe said it was praying for peace and asked that the police “ensure everyone’s safety.”

“We also call on the thousands of water protectors who stand in solidarity with us against DAPL to remain in peace and prayer,” the tribe said in the statement. “Any act of violence hurts our cause and is not welcome here.”

Floberg echoed that concern, saying that hours before the Morton County sheriff acted he had come across a roadblock on Highway 1806 consisting of a Chevrolet Suburban and a large log. He told U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs officials about it because 1806 is the main north-south highway in the area and a roadblock would prevent ambulances from reaching communities off the highway. The roadblock was later removed without incident, he said.

“What the church and our ministry at Standing Rock is trying to do today is to be standing on the rock of what in this is not shifting and moving, and we are trying to get ourselves to that because the violence that erupted yesterday is not something that can be repeated,” he said. “It’s going to cost somebody their life.”

Law-enforcement authorities Oct. 28 block Highway 1806, shutting it off to traffic from Fort Rice to Cannonball on the Standing Rock Sioux Nation reservation in North Dakota. Photo: Morton County Sheriff Department via Facebook

Law-enforcement authorities Oct. 28 block Highway 1806, shutting it off to traffic from Fort Rice to Cannonball on the Standing Rock Sioux Nation reservation in North Dakota. Photo: Morton County Sheriff Department via Facebook

That unmoving place is the rock of prayerful, peaceful and nonviolent action, he said. It is also about supporting the Standing Rock Sioux Nation’s desire to have access to clean water. The Sioux also want to protect the sacred area around the Missouri River, inhabited since at least the 1300s, where Native survivors of the Sept. 3, 1863, Whitestone Hill Massacre crossed the river into what is now Cannon Ball, North Dakota, and where the Sioux traded regularly with neighboring Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara tribes, despite sometimes being in conflict, Floberg said. More information about the site is here.

Finally, the protection action is not just aimed at the present, he said, but rather for the future “seven generations” and the “children that we will never know.”

The disputed 1,154-mile pipeline will run from the Bakken oil fields in northwest North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois, carrying as much as 570,000 barrels of oil a day. Energy Transfer Partners, the Dallas-based company building the pipeline, says construction will create 8,000 to 12,000 local jobs, while the AFL-CIO has pegged the number at 4,500. The construction company also says the pipeline will provide a “more direct, cost-effective, safer and environmentally responsible” way to transport oil and reduce the current use of rail and truck transportation

Archambault asked U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Oct. 25 to investigate “potential civil rights violations” involving law enforcement’s response to the continuing opposition to the pipeline’s construction.

The U.S. Justice Department responded that same day, saying it is monitoring the handling of the Dakota Access Pipeline project to “facilitate communication, defuse tensions, support peaceful protests, and maintain public safety.”

 – The Rev. Mary Frances Schjonberg is an editor and reporter for the Episcopal News Service.


Tags


Comments (13)

  1. Donald Heacock says:

    These demonstrators are never peacefully. They have set fires to tires. Open a camp on private property. They blocked the highway. They tied themselves to machines. The Federal Court has ordered the work to continue. The Church has lost its way . It has become the Democratic Party at prayer.
    .

    1. Louise Bower says:

      Actually, it seems the Church has at last found its way! ! We need to always be advocates for the poor and displaced. These nations were here long before the rest of us!!

      Let’s pray that Fr. John Floberg’s plan for a peaceful witness on Wednesday next will help to quell the hotheads. These people are not “vermin”, they are people fighting for their lives as a nation – water IS life, yes? We need to have a little sense of forgiveness. BTW, Fastening oneself to machinery, gates, or fences is a time-honored strategy of peaceful demonstrators – no one is being harmed except possibly the demonstrator, who may be risking his/her life.

      ALSO, if law enforcement came to these encounters in something less than battle gear, the reaction might be different.

      1. Priscilla Johnstone says:

        Louise B: I agree with you. Our PB has reached out to those with no voice in this pipeline development; this is an appropriate ministry for our Church, to support those in need to be seen, heard and respected. Coming on the heels of Flint, MI, we should all be aware of the need for clean, safe water for all our people. Native Americans have traditionally been pushed aside and ignored by our own Government and corporate interests when the land they were forced onto was found to have value, or development was encroaching and their land was determined to be fair game. Too many broken promises, too many betrayals. The Sioux deserve respect, for their culture, their sacred places, and their autonomy. I am proud of the Episcopal Church and proud to join in support efforts in our own community for the Standing Rock Sioux.

  2. Jeanette Hargreaves says:

    ENS – for those of us who can’t be there on Nov. 3rd, is there a petition we can sign to join in that way?

  3. Terry Francis says:

    While the Church should certainly be advocates for the poor and displaced, it should not be advocates for law-breaking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage. While I am sure most were there to protest peacefully, many were not. If TEC is going to jump on this bandwagon it should at least condemn those who use violence to get their point across. So far I’ve seen no condemnation from activists in the Church regarding violent activity, unless of course it’s accusations regarding law enforcement.

    1. Condemnation is not a Christian value. From the very first announcement of the Episcopal Church support of the Water Protectors, the church stated that they are in support of the instructions of the elders to engage in peaceful and prayerful protest. See this article:

      “The NDCIM invites other Episcopalians and people of good will to join us in these efforts.”
      http://www.episcopalcafe.com/north-dakota-episcopalians-stand-with-pipeline-protestors/

      The elders continue to express these guidelines, and Water Protectors at Standing Rock tell those who are contemplating coming to help not to come if they intend to be violent or cause trouble. The Standing Rock Sioux continue to ask for prayers of support.

      Here is one of the most recent calls for prayer:

      “We all must continue to visualize and intend/pray that the hearts of all involved in this situation continue to open. Police must be held accountable for their actions, though we must continue to welcome them over to the side of the water protectors.”

      http://themindunleashed.com/2016/11/2-police-officers-turn-in-badges-in-support-of-standing-rock-water-protectors.html

  4. Francis O'Brien says:

    I hope the church is careful in taking sides on a controversy like this. It is hard to get the facts. The church can best be a mediator if it hasn’t taken sides.

    1. Revelation 3:15
      I know your deeds; you are neither cold nor hot. How I wish you were one or the other.

  5. Ronald Davin says:

    With all this time standing with the protesters at standing rock, how do Church officials find time to spread the actual Gospel ?

    1. llola Maoris says:

      This church seems to have lost its way. Supporting protesters who are breaking the law and who are standing in the way of progress. Water is a commodity owned basically by no one. Water rights belong to the government where it is located. The people standing in the way of developing are nothing more than thugs. They want nothing more than to cause trouble, confusion, and havoc. Few of the so-called indigenous people have any clue as to what the real truths are about the water and the people who would be receiving it. They want to fight just to fight. They should so something that has some meaning and the PB should stay far away from this sort of dispute.

    2. Look to Matthew! The gospel is spread by actions as well as words.

      “…the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink, I was a stranger and you took Me in, 36 I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you looked after Me, I was in prison and you visited Me.’

      37 Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You something to drink? 38 When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39When did we see You sick or in prison and visit You?’

      40 And the King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.’”

  6. Terry Francis says:

    That’s a question Ronald, I wish someone would ask our presiding bishop.

  7. Kenneth Knapp says:

    It is interesting that four of the ten “top stories” on my browser deal with a trendy political protest that many Episcopalians don’t support judging by the comments. I don’t think that the resources we contribute to TEC should be used promoting political agendas that divide the church.

Comments are closed.